Humanoid Robot Joint System Near-field Acoustic Holography Inspection SolutionIssuing time:2026-09-25 23:05 Humanoid Robot Joint System |
| User category | Core requirements | Typical scenarios |
|---|---|---|
Capability boundary
This solution focuses on precise acoustic quantification at the joint and component level. Whole-machine-level abnormal-noise tracing falls outside the capability range of near-field measurement. Should whole-machine-level requirements arise, a panoramic acoustic imaging camera can be configured separately as an extension; that topic is not covered in this solution.

The physical structure of the humanoid robot joint module determines the unique difficulties of its acoustic inspection—and these difficulties happen to fall squarely within the capability range of near-field acoustic holography technology. The following demonstrates the logic of this technical fit from the perspective of physical mechanism.
The joint module highly integrates a frameless torque motor, a harmonic reducer, an encoder, and support bearings within a housing only tens to just over a hundred millimeters in diameter. The potential sources—the flexspline/circular spline meshing point, the flexible bearing, the motor stator and rotor, and the output bearing—are separated from one another by only a few millimeters to a few centimeters. Multiple sources overlap heavily in space to form a densely packed source cluster. Conventional acoustic imaging cameras and beamforming techniques can hardly distinguish individual sources within such a compact space, giving rise to a clear “microscopic blind zone.”
Humanoid robot joint noise is dominated by low-frequency structural excitation: the flexspline deformation fundamental frequency of the harmonic reducer and its mesh stiffness fluctuation (2–4× the input rotation frequency), motor cogging torque fluctuation, and joint resonance frequencies are mostly concentrated in the low-frequency band of tens to several hundred hertz, while meshing frequency sidebands are distributed in the mid-frequency band. Low-frequency acoustic wavelengths can reach the meter scale, whereas the spatial resolution of conventional beamforming is constrained by the Rayleigh diffraction limit (on the order of half a wavelength). Localization spots for low-frequency sources therefore appear at the “meter scale”—large and blurry—and cannot lock onto the excitation point.
Near-field Acoustic Holography (NAH) fundamentally breaks through this limit: in the near field of the source, a high-density array simultaneously measures propagating waves and evanescent waves, and the sound field is reconstructed through an inverse propagation mathematical transform, achieving centimeter-level source localization accuracy (sub-wavelength resolution is attainable under ideal near-field and high-signal-to-noise-ratio conditions). This carries low-frequency source tracing across the gap from “meter-level blur” to a “fine origin.”
The prerequisite for capturing evanescent waves is satisfying the spatial Nyquist sampling requirement—the spacing between array microphones must be small enough to recover the high spatial frequency components of the source. The NAH1024 ultra-large planar array uses 1024 microphones at approximately 30 mm spacing to form a 960 mm × 960 mm high-density sampling plane, which exactly satisfies the sampling density required for reconstructing mid- and low-frequency evanescent waves, providing the physical basis for breaking through the diffraction limit.
Meshing impacts caused by tooth profile errors and tooth backlash are transient, broadband excitations that appear instantaneously only at specific phases and under specific operating conditions. If point-by-point scanning measurement is used, serial acquisition will lose transient features and produce spatial localization deviation due to time-varying operating conditions. The millisecond-level synchronous “one-touch snapshot” of the NAH1024’s 1024 channels completes full-field data acquisition with a single trigger, fully capturing transient meshing impacts and eliminating the localization error introduced by scanning movement.
As a solution founded on R&D rigor, we define the capability boundaries of the NAH1024 forthrightly:
Excitation sources inside closed housings—NAH directly reconstructs the normal vibration velocity of the housing surface, and its output is the surface acoustic radiation hotspot. Precise localization of internal meshing points requires indirect inference in combination with structural dynamics transfer paths; for dismantled open components (reducers, motor stators, etc.), direct measurement is possible.
Resolution constrained by signal-to-noise ratio—centimeter-level localization can be reliably achieved under normal operating conditions, while sub-wavelength accuracy depends on the near-field measurement distance and high-signal-to-noise-ratio conditions.
Frequency band boundary—an array spacing of approximately 30 mm corresponds to a spatial sampling upper limit of approximately 5.7 kHz, so the effective reconstruction band of the NAH1024 is positioned in the mid- and low-frequency range (approximately below 5 kHz). High-frequency components at the 20 kHz level, such as PWM switching sidebands, exceed the spatial sampling upper limit and require the support of high-frequency localization methods.
| Inspection target | Typical noise mechanism | NAH inspection output |
|---|---|---|
| Harmonic reducer (flexspline / circular spline / flexible bearing) | Periodic flexspline deformation excitation, mesh stiffness fluctuation, tooth profile error | Localization of acoustic radiation hotspots on the housing surface, with inference of the meshing excitation source in combination with structural analysis |
| Frameless torque motor | Cogging torque fluctuation (low frequency), PWM switching sidebands (high frequency) | Identification of mid- and low-frequency electromagnetic excitation sources (high-frequency sidebands require other methods) |
| Planetary reducer / gearbox | Meshing impacts caused by tooth backlash and tooth profile error; bearing defect impacts | Meshing frequency source tracing; early bearing fault localization |
| Roller screw linear actuator | Screw–nut meshing noise; preload mismatch | Three-dimensional localization of linear excitation points |
The above targets focus on the joint module and its core components, covering core joints such as the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle as well as the dexterous hand, and spanning the two mainstream configurations of rotary and linear actuators. For closed joint assemblies, the “surface hotspot + structural inference” approach is adopted; for dismantled components, direct near-field measurement is performed.
Conventional noise reduction relies on empirical iteration: modifying tooth profiles, substituting materials, and adjusting assembly all require repeated trial-and-error validation. The three-dimensional sound pressure / particle velocity / sound intensity contour maps output by NAH can point directly to acoustic radiation hotspots on the structural surface; combined with structural analysis to infer the excitation source, noise reduction shifts from “trial and error” to “targeting,” significantly shortening R&D cycles and reducing development costs.
Harmonic reducers are a key component in domestic substitution, and differences in batch consistency translate directly into whole-machine NVH dispersion. The quantitative acoustic field fingerprints provided by NAH enable batch-by-batch acoustic consistency evaluation of incoming reducers, rapidly identifying batch-level defects such as tooth profile deviation and assembly tightness and gatekeeping the quality of core components.
Assembly deviations such as shaft train parallelism, bearing clearance, and preload significantly alter sound field characteristics. NAH inspection can serve as a means of reverse verification of assembly quality, inferring the type and location of assembly deviation from sound field characteristics and guiding the standardization of assembly processes.
Early bearing wear and lubrication failure manifest weak acoustic signatures in the sound field before indicators such as vibration and temperature rise do. The high sensitivity of NAH can capture these weak acoustic precursors during the incipient stage of a fault, supporting predictive maintenance of humanoid robot joints, extending the service life of core components, and reducing O&M costs.
No unified acoustic quality standard yet exists for humanoid robot joint modules. The quantitative, reproducible three-dimensional sound field data provided by NAH can serve as the technical foundation for standard development, advancing the industry from “empirical judgment” toward “data-driven standardization.”
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Microphones | 1024 elements (65 dB SNR) |
| Sensitivity | −24 dB |
| Microphone response frequency range | 50 Hz – 20 kHz |
| NAH effective spatial reconstruction band | 50 Hz – 5 kHz (mid- and low-frequency) |
| Signal-to-noise ratio | 65 dB SNR |
| Array dimensions | 960 mm × 960 mm (customizable deployment) |
| Core algorithm | Near-field Acoustic Holography (NAH); breaks through the diffraction limit for sub-wavelength resolution |
Notes: (1) The sensitivity figure is quoted as −24 dB; its reference basis (e.g., re 1 V/Pa or dBFS) is to be specified. (2) The 65 dB SNR figure is applicable to the microphone array; whether it is a per-channel, array-level, or system-level value is to be specified. (3) The “50 Hz – 5 kHz” effective reconstruction band is bounded by the array’s spatial sampling limit (approximately 5.7 kHz at 30 mm spacing), as described in Section 3.5.

The acoustic quality of humanoid robots has become a key bottleneck on the path to mass production and deployment in quietness-sensitive scenarios, and what the industry currently lacks is precisely the inspection capability of “precise localization and source tracing.” By virtue of three physical advantages—“capturing evanescent waves, breaking through the diffraction limit, and high-density synchronous sampling”—near-field acoustic holography technology is naturally suited to the acoustic characteristics of humanoid robot joints—“densely packed, low-frequency dominant, transient excitation”—and can upgrade noise reduction from “black-box trial and error” to “mechanism-level precise localization.”
This solution is a single-point, in-depth solution centered on the NAH1024 ultra-large planar array. It focuses on the market blank of “specialized acoustic NVH inspection for humanoid robot joints,” covers five value dimensions—R&D source tracing, supply chain evaluation, assembly verification, O&M diagnosis, and standards development—and ensures deliverability through rigorous definition of technical boundaries, helping joint modules achieve “quiet, stable motion” and accelerating high-quality mass production of the industry.
GroupCore Acoustic
Hear the subtle, perceive the profound.
Beijing GroupCore Acoustic Technology Co., Ltd.
For a detailed technical whitepaper or to schedule a prototype demonstration, please contact us: Mr. Zhang, +86 186 0053 8599